Table of Contents
I would certainly add Toyota 2/3TC motor is someplace in the leading three however with those domestics you absolutely have my top four of all time for reliability. Brian wrote: I miss my 4.9 vehicle. Never had an engine problem. Corrosion is a different tale. When the exhaust rusted off behind the cat it simply appeared like a diesel.
I ask yourself just how hard a swap it would be to obtain it right into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a difficult time getting out of it's very own way ... the 300i6 would certainly do whatever I require this vehicle to do patgizz created: 3 things in the auto world refuse to damage.
those should be held as the standard to which whatever else is measured. Practically whatever else fades in comparison. And the Toyota 2f/3f (based on the chevy stovebolt 6 of course) Wow, as a result of the outpour of appreciation, it looked great so I acquired it, below's the advertisement lmk what you men assume Oops, didn't imply to be cryptic, it slipped my mind that the "5.0" was technically a 4.9 l.
Order of biz however, I'm rather huge, and the guiding wheel to seat is fairly slim ... man that wheel cover was not ribbed for my pleasure:-LRB- The only problem I've ever seen with trucks like that, are broken shifters. Ford made them a little also tough and they would certainly break right at the floorboard.
Bear in mind the gas mileage won't be the ideal worldwide, yet it will certainly damn sure run permanently. Edit: I'm 6'2" and 280. I always had a lot of area in the cab of them. wbjones composed: Brian wrote: I miss my 4.9 truck. Never ever had an engine concern.
When the exhaust rusted off behind the pet cat it just appeared like a diesel. I wonder just how hard a swap it would be to get it right into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a hard time getting out of it's very own method ... The engine bay wasn't created for anything longer than a Mod motor. One Canister get rid of an engine from a '97 design F-150 from the top, yet it sucks.
WonkoTheSane created: spitfirebill created: In respond to HappyAndy: Thank you Captain Obvious What did he state to necessitate this? I'm really curious. I really did not see anything in his reply that would certainly require this action. "They are usually reputable as gravity so long as they aren't sludged up" What engine likes sludge? Knurled created: wbjones wrote: Brian wrote: I miss my 4.9 vehicle.
Rust is a various tale. When the exhaust rusted off behind the cat it just seemed like a diesel. In 4x4 it returned 15 combined, 20 freeway with the OD5. I question how hard a swap it would be to obtain it right into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ...
Extremely very cramped engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had already figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek blog post, that I didn't explain ... my bad In respond to spitfirebill: I included that point due to the fact that when I had to find a replacement 4.9 for my F150, I had to go through every one in every junkyard in South Jacket to discover one that had not been sludged up truly badly.
Bernie: Which is a far better van, while we're going to talk concerning a couple of issues of these vans, however I I'm clearly not going to come out and state one is better than the various other. Bernie: Well, they're essentially the same automobile.
Mark: So, well, allow's begin with engines after that. Allow's talk regarding engine and really just to define that the design years, we're going to begin from 2000 and up, you know, I suggest, these vans have actually been around for a long time.
And, you know, for a version of a Chevy van has been around because, you understand, around that time also. We're not going to get back into, right into the earlier things. Given that 2000, I mean, Ford's, you can get these with V6 engines or V8s. V8s are much extra preferred and I wouldn't truly advise a V6 engine.
There's a great deal of issues with these engines. In the earlier 2000 trigger plugs with blow to these engines, since they really did not have adequate threading in the stimulate plug, which triggered problems.
Really extremely confined engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had already figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek blog post, that I didn't explain ... my negative In reply to spitfirebill: I added that point because when I needed to discover a substitute 4.9 for my F150, I had to go with every one in every junkyard in South Jacket to find one that wasn't sludged up truly severely.
Bernie: Which is a better van, while we're going to speak regarding a few concerns of these vans, yet I I'm plainly not going to come out and say one is far better than the other. Bernie: Well, they're basically the same automobile.
Mark: So, well, let's begin with engines then. Let's talk regarding engine and in fact simply to define that the model years, we're going to begin from 2000 and up, you know, I mean, these vans have actually been around for a long time.
And, you know, for a version of a Chevy van has actually been around because, you understand, around that time also. Given that 2000, I suggest, Ford's, you can get these with V6 engines or V8s.
So, you recognize, Fords, and most of them come with the Triton V8. There's a whole lot of issues with these engines. In the earlier 2000 ignition system with impact to these engines, since they really did not have sufficient threading in the ignition system, which triggered issues. And frequently that would happen when you may be in a 15 guest bus rising a hill with a tons of individuals and all of an unexpected boom, a spark plug bulges and you're stranded.
Navigation
Latest Posts
Ford F150 dealership
Ford F150 dealer near me Boise City
Ford F150 dealer